Posts Tagged ‘Pollution Insurance’

Pollution Solution

Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

By William Pritchard Jr., ERM
Printed in the February 2011 issue of American Agent & Broker

2010 saw a rapid expansion of the environmental/pollution insurance marketplace in the face of daunting conditions. Why this growth has occurred, and what it means to an agency, are important to understand. The performance of this niche clearly illustrates the efforts being made to find success in our evolving market, and agents that can correctly tap into it will see significant return on their investment.

In 1990, four companies offered dedicated environmental insurance products. In 2000 there were closer to 10. At the end of 2010, there were at least 40 companies with environmental practices. One thousand percent growth over 20 years is significant, but even more significant is the growth in the last 3 years, from 20 to 40. Companies including XL (formerly ECS), Chartis (formerly AIG), Zurich, Markel, Liberty, Chubb and others have been involved almost from the beginning. In the face of the most difficult market most can remember, why has environmental been such a draw for carriers? And what does this explosive growth mean for the insurance agent?
At the root of the growth in environmental carriers is the underlying shift in how insurance works. Carriers have long underwritten to very small profit goals, recognizing investment income as the true driver of their profitability for their investors. Equity market returns of 10 percent or greater were the norm for many years. Carriers generated premium, reserved conservatively, putting that money into IBNR, and saw the investment income profits role in. This model served our industry very well for many years and through many market cycles.

Unfortunately, this underlying dynamic has changed. The investment market is no longer able to return such generous results to its investors, and this is in turn is forcing companies to find their profits elsewhere. The only viable solution is to try to underwrite accounts more profitably than before.

While this seems like a simple task, it is anything but. Due to the difficult economic environment over the last 3 years, the insurance industry is struggling to write as much premium as in the past, not to mention at a greater profit. As whole sections of the economy lose value, the insurers that cover them generate less in premium. With current unemployment figures hovering at just under 10 percent, the industry that rates based on payroll has taken a real hit. Adding to this the anemic overall growth of the economy, and you end up with carriers fighting for more slices of a shrunken pie.

Add to this the reduction of loss reserves at many companies. Carriers traditionally bring reserves down as prior year results have allowed, dropping those dollars right to their bottom lines. Unfortunately, given the lack of investment returns, they are no longer filling that reserve pool back up as aggressively as they once did. The money that eventually came out and bolstered the bottom line is rapidly going away. If a company can maintain strong underwriting profitability, this is not a huge problem. If, however, carriers have to fight for business and write risks for less than they want to, this can quickly become a significant long term issue.

The final piece of the puzzle is the dramatic influx of capital into the industry as a whole. While the insurance industry has been struggling, the promise of a decent enough return excites investors into the marketplace, especially compared with the return the equity markets have yielded. Over the last 5 years there has been a steady influx of money into the insurance industry, all of it seeking a home and a respectable ROI.

So how does this all lead to an increase in environmental programs over the last several years? The answer is simple. When environmental business was first written in the late ‘70s and early ‘80s, carriers had no idea how to price it. Coming off of horrific asbestos-related claims, carriers were very cautious in how they priced these products. Over the intervening 30 years, it has been shown that environmental exposures are not significantly more challenging than many other casualty lines. While there are of course exceptions in certain areas, the general consensus is that environmental risks are more profitable than many other mature market segments.

This is where things get interesting. While this may be true, it is by no means universally true. Over the last 10 years carriers have blended coverages to sell under the heading “environmental.” Many of these combine CGL and products with site or contractors pollution. While the environmental component of the package may in fact be profitable, there is ample evidence that casualty business is, and will always be, casualty business. If you write tough products, you are going to have some real claims. If you write a combined CGL and contractors pollution policy for a tank installation contractor, you are more likely to see claims from people falling into holes than you are from pollution. So while “environmental” insurance has proven itself to be very profitable over the last 30 years, it is mutating into something different where the genes of its more standard components may well be dominating the results.

Another challenge is the people. Environmental insurance has had a very short and squat pyramid; broad base but not much room at the top. Over the last 10 years many talented men and women have risen in the ranks of environmental insurers. Many of them have been looking for the next step into senior management. Heading an environmental unit is often the crown jewel of someone’s career. Many of these people are looking hard for the opportunity to jump their careers to the next level, and are aggressively reaching out to carriers without an environmental unit to try to create the job they seek. All of the above pieces have lined up over the last several years. We have an influx of capital, we have carriers looking for ways to write more business more profitably, we have a market segment with a history of profitability and we have people willing to lead these new divisions. Given all of the above, it’s a wonder we don’t have even more markets focusing on environmental accounts.

What does this mean for an agent? Many may think choice is a good thing, and in many respects it is. Environmental insurance is a class of business where individual underwriter appetite often dictates what a carrier will write, or at least will try to write aggressively. Having only one or two relationships leaves an agent at the mercy of one or two individuals. If, on the other hand, an agent can go to 40 different markets, he or she should never have to worry about any single underwriter blocking the path to success.

While on the surface this makes some sense, it is a very dangerous path for an agent to follow for a few reasons. The characteristics of a good carrier relationship differ for many agencies, but in general they include carrier stability and commitment to the line, underwriter knowledge and responsiveness, solid claims handling system and track record and proven service capabilities. All of these components add up to not only success writing an account, but long-term success in servicing and maintaining the business. Compounding growth only comes through happy insureds renewing year after year. If claims are not being paid and endorsements not delivered, it makes every renewal a fight instead of an affirmation.

Determine your Partners
The environmental marketplace has grown quickly, and the development of many programs has been somewhat mixed. There are surface indications that agents can review to determine if a market will be a good partner for them.

The first is the commitment carriers have made to environmental insurance. Are they in this for the long haul or are they simply trying to write some quick business? A gauge of this commitment is their staffing situations. How many employees have they hired? How many offices or locations do they have? Are they making enough of a commitment for an agent to know that they can adequately service the business they are writing, and that they are in it for the long run? We have seen markets enter this arena recently with two or three employees, and we have seen others enter with 15. Clearly one is making a bigger commitment than the other.

A similar issue is the claims handing staff. Has it hired at least a few key claims people to handle environmental claims? Environmental claims are not the same as regular casualty claims, and people with experience in this area are critical for long term success of a program.

The final key component is management and underwriting staffing. Is the person the insurer hired to put the program together an experienced environmental and insurance professional? A senior underwriter making the move to management can be fraught with problems, as the management role is so complex. Does the person coming on board have the background to be successful? Also, who has been hired as underwriters? Do they have experience and credibility in the marketplace? Again, seasoned experienced underwriters and a structure to enable them to succeed are very important.

Agents need to partner with companies that are committed to the line of business. A company that hopes to be doing this in 10 years is far more likely to responsibly deal with the issues that will inevitably come up than one who is in it for short term premium volume. While the above do not guarantee commitment, they certainly indicate it.

Once an agent is satisfied with this, the next important component is reviewing and understanding the coverage being offered. No two environmental policies are the same, and there is huge diversity in the type of coverage being offered. Knowing what you’re offering the client is crucial, certainly as crucial as knowing the carrier you are offering it from.

Given the above, an agent may find that the best way to access environmental carriers is to go through a specialty broker. In the current marketplace these brokers typically pay the same commissions that direct carriers would, and give the added advantage of having done a lot of the above leg work for the agent. The same criteria need to be utilized to make this selection as was used for the carrier review. Longevity, commitment, expertise, reputation are all import and easily judged items. Spending a few moments researching the web and talking to other agents and carriers can bring you excellent choices for partners.

The environmental market is still growing fast. One of the positive offshoots of so much competition is a huge increase in marketing. All of these carriers, and the many brokers focusing on the line of business, are marketing the coverage. This is leading to an increased awareness at all levels. More job specs are requiring pollution coverage, as are landlords, lenders and attorneys. This increase in exposure is a definite plus for agents seeking new coverages to offer their clients.

Last year’s BP oil spill has been yet another driver of increased interest. Many of the business impacted by the spill, from coastal property owners to people making their livings along the Gulf Coast, could have been protected by the right environmental coverage. Many businesses have learned from this situation, and other lesser-known ones in their own back yards, and are reaching out to their agents to discuss what coverage is available to them. Most insureds can talk about a similar business or an associate they know that has had an environmental issue come up. This increases the population buying these products from hundreds in the early days to hundreds of thousands today.

The evolving insurance industry has challenged many but has also created opportunities unlike any seen before. Agents wield a great deal of power in this market, being the gate keepers to their clients. With so many agents and carriers scrambling to find business, and in some cases willing to do almost anything for it, the potential fallout is huge. Inadequate coverage, carriers gone after a year or two, and similar problems will force many agencies and carriers to the sidelines. Those that take time to consider the choices they are making, and the long term ramifications of them, will rise above their competition. This is already beginning to happen, as some are seeing significant growth in new business and strong renewal retention while others are falling fast. As the economy continues to improve, and with it the equity markets, the frenzy of the last few years will fade, and competence and professionalism will prevail. A solid environmental strategy is only one component, albeit an important one, of the thoughtful agencies’ strategy to continue to succeed in our new marketplace.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to StumbleUpon

Carriers are Redefining Underwriting Guidelines for Contractors

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

It’s easy to identify when a contractor falls into the ‘environmental contractor’ category when he or she has a title like asbestos abatement contractor or mold remediation contractor, but what about contractors who do more general contracting work? Can we write General Liability coverage for them as well? Our underwriters have always recognized that that there is a risk to some of these more general contracting classes of business and have acknowledged that the accounts do have a Pollution exposure, but just couldn’t justify writing the GL and Pollution for them. In the past, most carriers have required at least 50% of receipts to be from environmental services in order to be considered an ‘environmental contractor.’

We are now finding that the requirements for this split have gone down significantly, and our markets are becoming more flexible in the types of accounts they will consider. Many carriers have seen the benefit of writing both the GL and Pollution for these risks and are therefore redefining these underwriting guidelines. Account types include:

  • Bioremediation contractors
  • Industrial cleaners
  • Demolition contractors
  • Crime scene cleanup/meth lab cleanup contractors
  • Bio-solid applicators
  • Service station contractors
  • Pipeline contractors
  • Fire & water restoration contractors
  • Many others – please talk with a Beacon Hill representative to discuss a specific account.

Check out some of our recent GL/CPL environmental contractor success stories!

For more information, call us at 1-800-596-2156.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to StumbleUpon

BP Oil Spill Disaster Creates Opportunity for Environmental Contractors’ Market

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

Article written by Beacon Hill’s Assistant Vice President, Michael Tighe. Featured in the August 2010 issue of Insurance Journal.

No matter which television channel or website you turn to, the Gulf oil spill has dominated the news. This is an environmental crisis that will affect the region’s economic capabilities and natural resources for years, if not decades, to come. Between 2 to 4 million barrels of oil have spilled into the gulf, compared to 257 thousand barrels during the Exxon Valdez event . The fishing and tourism industry, which was depressed before the tragedy, is now virtually non-existent. Gulf coast economies from Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida have all been affected, and scientists are predicting that the Gulf current may carry contaminants along the Florida Keys and up the east coast.

This disaster creates a tremendous opportunity for remediation contractors and consultants. Environmental contractors from across the country have flocked to the Gulf in search of clean-up contracts. Over twenty-four thousand people are working as part of the response to the April 20th accident and its aftermath. The spill has created a wide array of jobs from remediation/spill response contractors to ship boat captains to day laborers. Many unemployed fishermen, construction workers, and general laborers are receiving OSHA HAZOPER training and aiding in the clean up. “We have received numerous phone calls about potential start-up businesses or companies opening up new divisions in this area,” said Michael Tighe, Assistant Vice President at Beacon Hill Associates, a wholesale insurance broker and program administrator, specializing in the placement of environmental insurance.

Remediation Methods Used

More than 46,000 people – and nearly 7,000 boats – are now employed in the response1. While fishing business was struggling before the disaster, fishermen are now making $1,200 – $3,000 a day laying floating booms that contain oil once it rises to the surface . Where the oil collection is greatest they often create a “burning box”, which is a controlled burn over the water. In the marshes and other wetlands, contractors are mopping the oily sheen with absorbent oil pads, wiping each blade of grass, which can be time-consuming labor. In open water, boats are equipped with oil/water separators that skim surface water and can extract two thousand barrels of oil per day . Thousands of workers comb the beach using shovels or shifting machines collecting tarballs on the sand. Unfortunately, oil can be buried underneath the sand, between tides, which will require sand incineration or other deeper cleaning methods.

Potential Coverage Issues

Below are some coverage issues agents should consider when obtaining Pollution insurance for their clients.

Action over – not all liability policies provide action over coverage. An employee of the contractor may potentially sue the project owner directly for liabilities suffered during the work. This type of claim occurs more frequently with remediation contractors.

Time element triggers – some policies limit pollution to a sudden/accidental trigger only whereby the pollution occurrence and claim filing must occur within a limited period of time (usually 72 hours).  A policy that includes gradual pollution is more effective for emergency response contractors.

Coverage territory – The coverage territory within the policy may not include international waters.

Designated operations – Many Contractor Pollution policies provide coverage only for operations listed on the policy. If the contractor’s work expands beyond what is listed, no coverage may be afforded.

Watercraft exclusions – there are specific limitations under a package General Liability and Pollution policy pertaining to the use and length of boats allowed.

Subcontracted work and construction management exclusions – if the remediation contractor is using subcontractors, liability may extend only if the sub meets specific qualifications and insurance requirements. Also, the supervision of subcontractors may not be covered unless a Professional Liability policy is in force.

Transportation and disposal issues – if the contractor is responsible for the transportation and disposal of waste, there may be no coverage afforded under a basic Contractors Pollution policy, should an incident occur beyond the boundaries of a job site. Limited coverage is attainable in the marketplace with proper information.

Product exposures – specific Product Pollution policies are available for manufacturers and distributors of chemical dispersants, separators, containment booms, etc. used in the spill response. Coverage can be written stand alone or in conjunction with a commercial General Liability policy.

Pollution definitions – vary greatly. Some do not include “waste” in their definition of a pollutant. If waste/refuse is not included in the definition, it may lead to gaps in completed operation and disposal coverage.

Property – hurricane and wind concerns – In addition to contracting pollution exposures there has also been interest in environmental coverages from property owners.  In the midst of hurricane season, commercial property owners are becoming increasingly concerned that high winds may carry petro contaminants onto their premises. Interested parties are not only coastal, but miles away from shore. If the specified cause of loss is not the windstorm but rupture of the underwater well, many agents have found little or no pollution clean up coverage for real or personal property. The next wave of environmental contractors to the Gulf may be restoration contractors equipped to extract water and oil in and on buildings.

Due to the influx of submissions that environmental markets are receiving, they are starting to quantify the number insureds involved in the clean up effort. Additional supplemental applications may be needed to gauge the amount of on and off shore activities, as well as the amount of work subcontracted. Some carriers are limiting their exposure to coastal premises/site pollution policies, possibly offering coverage with higher retentions or without first party clean up triggers.

While agencies scramble to secure pollution coverage for their clients being affected by the oil spill in the Gulf, they should also get a clear picture of the prospective insured’s scope of operations, contractual responsibilities, and qualifications. This is crucial in order to offer effective insurance solutions, as no two policies are the same in the environmental insurance marketplace.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to StumbleUpon

Pollution Insurance: Peace of Mind or Smart Marketing?

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Article by Bill Pritchard, President of Beacon Hill Associates, Inc.

In today’s competitive insurance industry and struggling economy, agents are hard pressed to sell anything more than the bare coverage necessities. But while this challenge may seem daunting, it is not without significant rewards. Increased revenue, stronger client relationships, and peace of mind are just a few. Given the pressures many agencies are currently feeling, certain additional coverages are an opportunity to grow in this soft market.

Many insureds have exposures that are broader than the coverage they carry. While this is not the easiest thing for agents to talk with their clients about, it is a crucial discussion nonetheless. With all of the other difficulties a business faces, inadequate coverage is not acceptable in the face of a significant claim. No agent wants to be on the wrong side of that conversation should it happen to their client.

One such exposure is posed by the pollution exclusion in the CGL policy. Virtually every business has some degree of environmental exposure, given the very broad definition of a pollutant that is addressed by that exclusion. Most airborne irritants fit the definition, leading to a wide range of possible coverage gaps.

Clearly, this is a coverage every insured should know about. It is important for an agent to recognize the value of this product—in many respects, what makes this a good product for the agent also makes it a good choice for the insured.

Agents are presented with many ancillary exposures and coverages to consider with their clients. Typically they cannot all be addressed. Given this, an agent needs to choose which coverages to provide terms on, and which to briefly discuss and let go. For an agent, there are two key considerations when deciding this. The first is that there is an exposure that is not addressed by the insured’s current insurance program. The next is that coverage is available from quality carriers, is effective, and is affordable. A positive response to these questions means an agent should offer the coverage, as failing to do so would put an agency in an untenable position in the event of a loss.

Once the choice to focus on environmental coverage has been made, the attention can then turn to the advantages to offering it. Luckily there are many.

First and foremost, offering broader coverage to a client helps demonstrate an agency’s professionalism. A firm that understands the complex needs of their clients in relation to the structure of the policies they offer is clearly seen as a more professional, experienced, and valuable agency partner. Knowing the coverage and having the tough conversations about it is what distinguishes agencies from each other. Environmental insurance is an excellent opportunity to do just that.

Similarly, insureds who carry environmental coverage are in a position to use that to differentiate themselves from their competitors. Advising potential clients of the scope of this coverage, and the added security it provides, gives them a competitive edge. Contracts calling for pollution coverage are easily met, allowing insureds to present themselves as prepared and professional.

In addition to the advantages gained through enhanced stature, pollution coverage gives both parties peace of mind. For the agent this comes from knowing that a client’s significant coverage gap has been addressed. Regardless of how thorough an agent has been in having the client disclaim coverage offered, it is always better to have the coverage in force than to have to worry about a potential problem down the road. In a world where coverage that is missing from an insured’s policy is found in the agency’s errors and omissions policy, having a client purchase the proper insurance is more than just a good idea.

For an insured, a similar peace of mind exists. As every business owner knows, walking the tightrope of coverage versus exposure can be stressful. Insurance is a powerful risk management tool and is a key component of every insured’s management plan. Deciding which risks to retain, and which to transfer, has to be based on a complete knowledge and understanding of the actual risk. Once the environmental exposures are explained to the insured, the decision to purchase coverage becomes a clear choice between retention and transfer. Deciding to purchase broader coverage and transfer the risk puts yet another business threat in the category of transferred, and allows the insured to focus their concerns elsewhere.

There are financial incentives for both the agent and insured in the purchase of environmental coverage as well. As with the exposures, having a clear picture of the benefits to both parties is crucial to the decision-making process. For an agent, there is of course an actual cost to generate this class of business. Marketing to carriers, brokers, MGAs and other market sources can be time consuming and difficult. Many carriers require separate appointments for environmental coverage, and require their own unique application as well.

Luckily, there are several ways to access the market in an efficient way that also increases the likelihood of receiving a high quality program designed specifically for the insured. There are a few highly skilled, experienced specialty brokers that can give a retail agent access to the top carriers in the business, offering very broad coverages. Many of these brokers are well known for their product knowledge, and give the agent the tools needed to explain both the exposures and the coverages to the client. The right specialty broker can add significant value to the agent’s process, increasing the odds of writing the account at the lowest possible cost in a reasonable timeframe for the agency.

Once effective coverage from a quality carrier has been found, the revenue it provides to the agency is a welcome addition in a difficult year. Commissions range from modest to excellent, depending on the source accessed. Regardless, the agent needs to keep in mind the value of linking another policy to the chain for that client. The more coverage they have in force for an insured, the harder it will be for a competitor to replicate the program or threaten the relationship at renewal.

As with the coverage considerations, the cost benefit analysis for the insured is a positive one as well. While the additional premium may not be something they initially plan on, given the softening market, it is unlikely that adding the coverage this year would push them above their expiring costs. Balanced against this is the additional business they can attract with the coverage, as well as the protection against unplanned environmental loss. Many insureds highlight this specific coverage in their marketing and SOQ materials. By recognizing the reasons why coverage is beneficial to the insured, agents are able to take this higher standard of security—for themselves and their clients—and turn it into revenue-generating opportunities.

Given the challenges of the economic climate in which businesses are currently functioning, there are many reasons why agents and their insureds should carefully consider environmental coverages. The downside of cost and effort is certainly offset by the opportunity to bring in more business. These benefits are shared equally between the agent and client, which create a unique and valuable synergy.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to StumbleUpon