|
|
Beacon Hill Associates, Inc. is a wholesale insurance broker and program administrator, specializing in the placement of environmental insurance and other specialty insurance coverages for agents nationwide.
Beacon Hill Blog
Posts Tagged ‘Site Pollution’
Thursday, August 12th, 2010
Article written by Beacon Hill’s Assistant Vice President, Michael Tighe. Featured in the August 2010 issue of Insurance Journal.
No matter which television channel or website you turn to, the Gulf oil spill has dominated the news. This is an environmental crisis that will affect the region’s economic capabilities and natural resources for years, if not decades, to come. Between 2 to 4 million barrels of oil have spilled into the gulf, compared to 257 thousand barrels during the Exxon Valdez event . The fishing and tourism industry, which was depressed before the tragedy, is now virtually non-existent. Gulf coast economies from Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida have all been affected, and scientists are predicting that the Gulf current may carry contaminants along the Florida Keys and up the east coast.
This disaster creates a tremendous opportunity for remediation contractors and consultants. Environmental contractors from across the country have flocked to the Gulf in search of clean-up contracts. Over twenty-four thousand people are working as part of the response to the April 20th accident and its aftermath. The spill has created a wide array of jobs from remediation/spill response contractors to ship boat captains to day laborers. Many unemployed fishermen, construction workers, and general laborers are receiving OSHA HAZOPER training and aiding in the clean up. “We have received numerous phone calls about potential start-up businesses or companies opening up new divisions in this area,” said Michael Tighe, Assistant Vice President at Beacon Hill Associates, a wholesale insurance broker and program administrator, specializing in the placement of environmental insurance.
Remediation Methods Used
More than 46,000 people – and nearly 7,000 boats – are now employed in the response1. While fishing business was struggling before the disaster, fishermen are now making $1,200 – $3,000 a day laying floating booms that contain oil once it rises to the surface . Where the oil collection is greatest they often create a “burning box”, which is a controlled burn over the water. In the marshes and other wetlands, contractors are mopping the oily sheen with absorbent oil pads, wiping each blade of grass, which can be time-consuming labor. In open water, boats are equipped with oil/water separators that skim surface water and can extract two thousand barrels of oil per day . Thousands of workers comb the beach using shovels or shifting machines collecting tarballs on the sand. Unfortunately, oil can be buried underneath the sand, between tides, which will require sand incineration or other deeper cleaning methods.
Potential Coverage Issues
Below are some coverage issues agents should consider when obtaining Pollution insurance for their clients.
Action over – not all liability policies provide action over coverage. An employee of the contractor may potentially sue the project owner directly for liabilities suffered during the work. This type of claim occurs more frequently with remediation contractors.
Time element triggers – some policies limit pollution to a sudden/accidental trigger only whereby the pollution occurrence and claim filing must occur within a limited period of time (usually 72 hours). A policy that includes gradual pollution is more effective for emergency response contractors.
Coverage territory – The coverage territory within the policy may not include international waters.
Designated operations – Many Contractor Pollution policies provide coverage only for operations listed on the policy. If the contractor’s work expands beyond what is listed, no coverage may be afforded.
Watercraft exclusions – there are specific limitations under a package General Liability and Pollution policy pertaining to the use and length of boats allowed.
Subcontracted work and construction management exclusions – if the remediation contractor is using subcontractors, liability may extend only if the sub meets specific qualifications and insurance requirements. Also, the supervision of subcontractors may not be covered unless a Professional Liability policy is in force.
Transportation and disposal issues – if the contractor is responsible for the transportation and disposal of waste, there may be no coverage afforded under a basic Contractors Pollution policy, should an incident occur beyond the boundaries of a job site. Limited coverage is attainable in the marketplace with proper information.
Product exposures – specific Product Pollution policies are available for manufacturers and distributors of chemical dispersants, separators, containment booms, etc. used in the spill response. Coverage can be written stand alone or in conjunction with a commercial General Liability policy.
Pollution definitions – vary greatly. Some do not include “waste” in their definition of a pollutant. If waste/refuse is not included in the definition, it may lead to gaps in completed operation and disposal coverage.
Property – hurricane and wind concerns – In addition to contracting pollution exposures there has also been interest in environmental coverages from property owners. In the midst of hurricane season, commercial property owners are becoming increasingly concerned that high winds may carry petro contaminants onto their premises. Interested parties are not only coastal, but miles away from shore. If the specified cause of loss is not the windstorm but rupture of the underwater well, many agents have found little or no pollution clean up coverage for real or personal property. The next wave of environmental contractors to the Gulf may be restoration contractors equipped to extract water and oil in and on buildings.
Due to the influx of submissions that environmental markets are receiving, they are starting to quantify the number insureds involved in the clean up effort. Additional supplemental applications may be needed to gauge the amount of on and off shore activities, as well as the amount of work subcontracted. Some carriers are limiting their exposure to coastal premises/site pollution policies, possibly offering coverage with higher retentions or without first party clean up triggers.
While agencies scramble to secure pollution coverage for their clients being affected by the oil spill in the Gulf, they should also get a clear picture of the prospective insured’s scope of operations, contractual responsibilities, and qualifications. This is crucial in order to offer effective insurance solutions, as no two policies are the same in the environmental insurance marketplace.

Tags: Contractors, Contractors Pollution Liability, CPL, Current Events, Environmental Exposures, Environmental Insurance, Exposures, Pollution Insurance, Site Pollution Posted in Articles | No Comments »
Thursday, July 15th, 2010
Need some claim scenarios to present to your insured? Here is a list of great examples you can use to show your facility clients the importance of having Site Pollution coverage.
- A property owner conducted Phase I and II Assessments prior to the sale of their facility. Soil and groundwater contamination was traced to a neighboring electronics manufacturing facility. The cause was an old raw material storage area that used to exist over gravel. This area is now over concrete containment. Total investigation, remediation and property damage claims exceeded $1.5 million.
- A property owner had his drinking water well tested prior to selling his land. Testing revealed that the well contained an alarmingly high concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons. Further investigation revealed that the source of contamination was several dozen drums of waste oil and maintenance fluids buried on a neighboring farm. Though the previous farm owner buried the drums, the current owner was nevertheless responsible for disposal of the drums, soil and groundwater cleanup, and bodily injury and property damage claims submitted by the neighboring property owner. Total costs exceeded $1,000,000 and caused the farmer’s bankruptcy.
- A waste storage area without secondary containment was stacked with drums of a caustic substance. The caustic substance eroded the drums and spilled onto the ground, into an adjacent creek. Subsequent remediation involved the removal of contaminated waste from the premises and dilution of waste from the creek. Cleanup costs exceeded $170,000.
- The toxic presence of methane and hydrogen sulfide gases caused nearly 200 homes in a small town to be evacuated. The emissions were traced to a local coal-mining site. Approximately 350 residents sought compensation for personal injury and property damages. The coal mine operator paid more than $9 million in settlement and defense costs.
- Fuel oil from an oil refinery was found to have leaked from below ground sewer hubs that were connected to aboveground storage tank drains. By the time the leak was discovered, contamination was detected in three groundwater plumes and onsite groundwater was also contaminated. The refinery paid nearly $5 million in cleanup costs and attorney fees.
- An aluminum trailer was loaded with a caustic substance at a transfer station. The substance corroded the trailer, spilling on the ground into an adjacent creek off-site. Constituents of the waste included creosols, methylene chloride and sodium hydroxide. The remedial effort involved pumping contaminated waste from the premises and pumping diluted waste from the creek. Cleanup costs exceeded $100,000.
- A chlorine gas release at a wastewater treatment plant resulted in toxic air emissions. Area residents and businesses were evacuated and several people were hospitalized for inhalation of fumes. A total of 12 businesses were forced to shut down for the better part of a day. Bodily injury claims amounted to $70,000 and business interruption claims totaled $120,000.
- A wastewater treatment plant that was 25 years old had been upgraded several times over the years. Improper closure of an old clarifier and on-site surface impoundment had allowed gradual seepage into the groundwater. These constituents contaminated the underlying groundwater, which was a potable water supply for the neighboring community. The costs for groundwater cleanup and emergency water supply for residents totaled $550,000.
- A maintenance garage that used solvents for parts washing performed the work over a drain leading to an on-site septic system. Over time, the septic system leach fields migrated into the surrounding soils and groundwater. At the time of the septic system closure and conversion to a public sewer system, the contamination was discovered. Site remediation involved soil removal and the installation of a groundwater recovery system. The costs exceeded $720,000.
For information, please visit our website or call us at 1-800-596-2156.
For product details, download a Site Pollution product information sheet (PDF).

Tags: Claim Scenarios, Premises Pollution, Site Pollution, Tools for Agents Posted in Environmental Insurance | No Comments »
Thursday, June 24th, 2010
We have all heard the current news about the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and its devastating effects on the environment, wildlife, and the fishermen whose livelihoods depend on the now-contaminated waters. But what about the hotels, golf courses, and other coastal properties that may be affected? Agents around the country working with facilities and commercial properties should use this situation as an opportunity to examine their clients’ current insurance policies and make sure the right coverage is in place.
Facilities have the potential for very unique pollution exposures due to their size, daily operations, and the amount of goods typically stored or handled on-site at any given time. To protect against waste that may threaten a facility, any operations which could result in a pollution exposure, or fires, floods, and other natural disasters, owners and managers of facilities should have Site Pollution coverage in place.
Why is Site Pollution coverage important?
Site Pollution Liability insurance, also known as Premises Pollution, Environmental Impairment Liability (EIL insurance), and Pollution Legal Liability (PLL), is designed to cover claims arising from pollution releases at, on, or emanating from a specific scheduled location. A “location” can be as broad as an entire piece of property or as narrow as a specified storage tank. Site Pollution Liability insurance is important because claims arising from a pollution condition from an insured’s premises may not be covered via the insured’s General liability or Property coverage form.
What types of facilities should carry Site Pollution coverage? Hotels, manufacturing facilities, warehouses, landfills, golf courses, recycling centers, restaurants, recreational facilities, and other commercial properties. All of these sites have the potential to experience, or be involved in, a chemical spill, natural disaster, midnight dumping, ground water issue, or other unforeseen exposure.
How does Site Pollution insurance work?
- Coverage is triggered either by a claim for damages from a third party, or by the discovery of contamination above “Actionable Levels” on the insured’s premises.
- “Actionable Levels” are a very important concept to understand. These levels are set in every community on a federal, state, or local level. They represent the allowable concentration of any contaminant for the area in which the contaminant is discovered.
- Policies clean up pollutants to the acceptable level dictated by the governing authority. In other words, if you have pristine land on which you spill diesel fuel, the government will require cleanup to below actionable levels of petroleum contaminants.
- Coverage can be modified to cover only new conditions occurring from policy inception onward, or unknown pre-existing conditions, or both.
- Coverage can be constructed to apply to only On-Site Bodily Injury, Property Damage, and Clean Up, or only Off-site, or both.
- Coverage is very flexible.
- Coverage is almost always Claims Made.
- Available product enhancements can often include first and third party Transportation Pollution Liability, Natural Resources Damages, coverage for scheduled Storage Tank systems, Mold coverage, Extended Reporting Periods, and coverage for Non-Owned waste disposal sites.
The current oil spill is a perfect example of a pollution event happening in one area and carrying over into another. Site Pollution Liability can help protect your clients’ facilities in the event of a problem like this occurring either on-site or on a different property/area and spilling over onto the insured’s premises.
To learn more about Site Pollution coverage or to discuss a specific account, call us today at 1-800-596-2156. You can also visit Beacon Hill’s Site Pollution webpage for more information.

Tags: Environmental Facilities, Facilities, Premises Pollution, Site Pollution Posted in Environmental Insurance | No Comments »
Thursday, April 15th, 2010
Owners and operators of manufacturing facilities face a unique set of exposures stemming from the activities that are part of their daily operations, the premises on which the operations are performed, and handling/distributing the products being manufactured. Here are some of the common coverages required to properly insure a manufacturing facility:
General Liability/Site Pollution
Combined GL and Premises Pollution coverage, which provides coverage for both on-site and off-site clean-up, defense costs, and third party bodily injury and property damage claims.
Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL)
Provides coverage for pollution claims arising from an insured’s covered and completed operations.
Products Pollution
Provides liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage to third parties arising out of a manufactured product.
For more information on coverages for manufacturers and claim scenarios relating to them, email us to request this information.

Tags: Contractors Pollution Liability, Environmental Insurance, Manufacturing, Products Pollution, Site Pollution Posted in Environmental Insurance | No Comments »
Monday, November 23rd, 2009
It is a misconception that the only people who have pollution exposures are those involved with hazardous substances. Unfortunately, this is not the case. In truth, anybody who works with, or can be held responsible for, the release of a substance into the environment that meets the definition of a “pollutant” in the ISO exclusion has a pollution exposure.
Trade Contractors are in a uniquely challenging position. While their responsibilities are often narrowly defined in the scope of services, they are usually one part of a multi-part process. This means that any claims that arise from a site may be brought against any or all of the contractors who performed operations at the location. And if the claim alleges something that is excluded by the contractor’s CGL policy, defense may not be provided.
Specific job site exposures that different types of trades have:
- Disturbing or exacerbating existing pollutants: Many contractors move earth, excavate, demolish, or otherwise alter existing features of a property. If any of those contain hazardous substances (petroleum contaminated soil, asbestos containing building materials, etc.), the contractor can be held responsible even though he was never advised that he would be.
- Contamination caused by materials the contractor brings to the site, such as paints, cleaning solvents, fuels, lubricants, etc.
- Contamination caused by operations, such as cutting through a gas line, installing flashing around window incorrectly, installing piping improperly, failing to solder joints, roofing leaks, erosion at site causing offsite contamination, etc.
- Contamination for which the contractor is held responsible, such as operations of a subcontractor to the trade contractor and actions of a party delivering materials to the site for the contractor.
- In addition to job site exposures, Trade Contractors also have exposures at the premises they own. This property, where they store their equipment and supplies, is often the single largest equity investment they have. Pollution at that location could reduce its value tremendously, effectively wiping out the equity built up by the owners.
- The final exposure area to note is Over the Road Pollution. This is the exposure that vehicles have going from owned premises to job sites. The upset and overturn of a vehicle can cause significant contamination, even if only from small amounts of fuels or solvents they use in their everyday work.
There are coverages available to address all of these exposures:
Contractors Pollution Liability
Designed to protect the Insured for claims stemming from pollution conditions at, on, or emanating from a job site arising where they are performing their operations.
Premises Pollution Liability
Coverage designed to protect against losses arising from the scheduled premises, which in this case would be the contractor’s owned properties.
Over the Road Pollution (Transportation Pollution Liability) is of course, coverage for pollution events during transit.
All of these coverages are available for most trade contractors, and they are all affordable. Many can be purchased together in packages, or separately depending on the needs of the particular Insured. For the trade contractor faced with many exposures that are effectively out of their control, consideration of this type of coverage is very important. In the current softening market, enhancing your clients’ coverage can be done for little additional premium and will help secure your relationship going into the future.

Tags: Contractors Pollution Liability, Environmental Insurance, Site Pollution, Transportation Pollution Liability Posted in Environmental Insurance | No Comments »
Thursday, October 1st, 2009
The EPA recently released a list of over 40 “high hazard potential” sites around the country that contain coal combustion residuals, commonly referred to as coal ash. This substance is a product of burning coal and is often stored in containment ponds or dams near electrical utilities. As coal ash leaches into the soil and spills into areas surrounding these facilities, there can be serious ramifications on human health and the environment. These storage ponds hold fly ash, bottom ash, coal slag, and flue gas residues that contain toxic metals such as mercury, arsenic, selenium, cadmium, and lead—all potentially toxic to people and wildlife.
Due to several recent coal ash spills, the EPA and other federal regulatory agencies are cracking down on the assessment, maintenance, and clean up of coal ash storage ponds in the U.S. These agencies will review the information provided by the facilities to identify issues that need priority attention, and will also visit many of these facilities to see if the management units are structurally sound. The top five states that are home to these “high hazard potential” sites include: North Carolina, Arizona, Kentucky, Ohio, and West Virginia.
Although the risks associated with hazardous coal ash sites can be devastating to the communities surrounding them, this is an opportunity for our government to take a more active role in making sure electrical (and other energy) utility sites are operating responsibly. This is also an opportunity for you to assist your clients—those who operate energy utilities as well as contractors who may be hired to clean them up—and make sure they have adequate environmental insurance. Take this opportunity to help your clients protect themselves from a potentially disastrous financial loss and secure the future of their businesses and workforces.
Contact Beacon Hill Associates, Inc. today for more information and applications.

Tags: Environmental Insurance, Pollutant, Site Pollution Posted in Articles, Environmental Insurance | No Comments »
Tuesday, September 1st, 2009
You may have heard that several industries anticipate a monetary payout from the impending economic stimulus legislations to be used for upgrades, improvements, and overall growth. One of the groups that will benefit from these funds funneling into the market is environmental facilities—landfills, recycling centers, wastewater treatment facilities, transfer stations, and alternative energy production plants.
As we all know, pollution coverage is generally excluded from a standard General Liability policy. Obvious exposures that affect environmental facilities include, but are not limited to: chemical leaks from onsite containers/tanks, toxic fumes emitted into the air, and untreated wastewater discharged into the public drinking water supply. However, pollutants are not always hazardous! A pollutant includes dust that can be kicked up by vehicles entering/leaving a landfill or wastewater run-off into a nearby stream. Even foul odors from transfer stations can require action, should a 3rd party make a claim.
A combined General Liability/Site Pollution Liability policy provides the best protection for environmental facilities, and is potentially the most cost effective solution as well. The pollution exclusion via the General Liability form is adequately addressed by the addition of Site Pollution Liability coverage; therefore, these facilities and their neighbors (like you and I) can all breathe a bit easier.
Available enhancements to packaged coverage for environmental facilities:
- - Packages can add Contractors Pollution Liability/ Professional Liability (Applies if insured is performing any contracting/consulting work offsite for clients; CGL coverage part excludes pollution and professional liability, creating a gap in coverage.)
- - Transportation Pollution Liability for any over the road exposure
- - Blanket Additional Insured and Waiver of Subrogation
- - Separate Follow form Excess policy available.
- - Separate Business Auto policy for insured’s fleet available for both hazardous and non-hazardous hauling exposures.
Help your environmental facility clients allocate some of their stimulus money to purchase coverage that will protect them in the long run. The bottom line is that facility owners simply can’t afford to forego environmental insurance when a potential claim may make their financial outlook even more fragile.

Tags: Environmental Facilities, Pollutant, Site Pollution Posted in Environmental Insurance | No Comments »
|
|